The functional consequences of the loss of threatened species across the world

The loss of vertebrates is not only an ethical tragedy; it can have dramatic effects on the functioning of ecosystems. The loss of threatened species would cause a decline of up to 30% of the functional diversity. Conservation priorities should focus on species with unique ecological functions.

Like Comment
Read the paper

In 2019, the Intergovernmental Science-Policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES) reported that “nature is declining globally at rates unprecedented in human history and the rate of species extinctions is accelerating, with grave impacts on people around the world”. Yet the vulnerability of the ecosystems face to the ongoing loss of species do not depend only on the number of threatened species but also on the ecological role of those species. These roles depend on the characteristics of the species (also called functional traits), like size, weight, shape, reproductive capacity, the food resource they use. If threatened species have unique functional traits, there loss can have dramatic effect on the functioning of the ecosystems, even with a low proportion of threatened species. Study only the number of species is not enough anymore, identifying the ecological role of the threatened species might help to better apprehend the future of the ecosystems.

During my PhD, I contributed to the development of a database of functional traits for freshwater fishes. Using this trait database, I showed that the functional vulnerability of the ecosystems did not only depend on the number of threatened species but also on whether those species host unique functional traits1. For example, although the Amazon River hosts high proportion of threatened species, those species play roles which can be, at least in part, performed by other species, thus preventing a drastic loss of functional diversity. It was however not the case for European’s or North American’s rivers where threatened species have unique functional traits. These extinctions of species would cause a drastic loss of the functional diversity of those rivers and hence could potentially modify the ecosystem functioning.

Thanks to the Estonian Research Council, I continued my research activities as a post-doc and now as a researcher in the Macroecology workgroup at the University of Tartu. Together with colleagues, we wanted to extant this study on freshwater fishes to all groups of vertebrates and plants. In June 2018, we decided to meet in a small team of young researchers in the field station in the world-famous species richness of Puhtu-Laelatu nature reserve to think how to tackle this challenge.

Fig. 1: Field station in Puhtu-Laelatu nature reserve (Credits: Meelis Pärtel)

During this meeting, we gathered as much as possible information about available functional traits for different taxonomic groups. We managed to compiled data of functional traits on about 70% of species of vertebrates (birds, mammals, reptiles, amphibians and freshwater fishes) and plants. For each groups, we collected data on relevant functional traits such as body-size, weight, shape, reproductive capacity, or the food resources they use. Using this unique source of data, we spent months to clean, harmonize and complement data in order to project the species in a functional space - a mathematical abstraction of their form and function (Fig. 2).

We published a first article2 showing that for all vertebrates and plants, the different functional traits can be summarized in two main ecological strategies: body-size (1st axis) and reproduction (2nd axis, Fig. 2). Moreover, simulating the loss of species listed as threatened of extinction by the IUCN, we showed that species with large body size and slow pace of life are more likely to be threatened of extinction. Given the huge importance of those species in the ecological processes, our results pointed out the need to devote strong effort to prevent the extinction of the megabiota.

Fig. 2: Functional spectra of plants and vertebrates. (Carmona et al. 2021)

In our new article, we wanted to go further and understand whether the different regions across the world would experience a similar loss in functional diversity in case of all threatened species goes extinct. Indeed, since species are not evenly distributed across the world, we could ask whether some regions (e.g. the topics) which host higher proportion of threatened species would be more functionally impacted than others. For that, we gather additional spatial information on the distribution of nearly 50,000 species of vertebrates in the six main biogeographic realms (Afrotropical, Australian, Nearctic, Neotropical, Indo-Malay and Palearctic). The biogeographic realms are define as entities of Earth’s land surface based on distributional patterns of terrestrial organisms. Each realm differ by their number of species but also their proportion of threatened species.

For each biogeographic realm, we investigated the changes in the functional diversity between the actual period and a future scenario where all species identified as threatened by IUCN are removed. We obtained a “landscape” picture indicating which areas of the functional space are going to be eroded (darkred areas) and even completely lost (black areas, Fig. 2). By doing this for the five groups of vertebrates in each realm, we show that the loss of threatened species will lead to uneven functional loss among realms and groups of vertebrates. The most striking result is that the Indo-Malay is more inclined to loose high proportion of its functional diversity for birds and mammals (up to 20%) while the Palearctic could experience a drastic loss of functional diversity for reptiles, amphibians and freshwater fishes (up to 30%). Thus, the Indo-Malay does not only support a higher than expected proportion of threatened species, but also a higher than expected proportion of threatened species with unique functional traits.

Fig. 3: Example of shifts in the functional diversity after the simulated extinction of threatened species for mammals (Toussaint et al. 2021).

We finally investigate the causes of such loss in functional diversity. For mammals, the loss in functional diversity are mainly linked to the loss of higher primate’s species, such as chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes), bonobos (Pan paniscus) and gorillas (Gorilla spp.) in Africa, or orang-utans (Pongo spp.) in the Indo-Malay realm, and some spider monkeys (Ateles spp.) and capuchin monkeys (Cebus spp.) in the South-American tropics. For birds, the loss in functional diversity in the Indo-Malay realm is mainly due to the loss of large birds such as the white-shouldered ibis (Pseudibis davisoni) or the Indian vulture (Gyps indicus) which are edging very close to extinction, mainly due to habitat loss and degradation.

For reptiles, amphibians and freshwater fishes, the changes of functional diversity were more even across the world but affecting different kind of species. For instance, many large-bodied freshwater fishes, such as sturgeons (Acipenser spp.), are threatened in the Palearctic, whereas many small-bodied species, such as suckermouth armoured catfishes (Chaetostoma spp.), are threatened in the Neotropics. The Palearctic was the most impacted realms for amphibians because threatened species host a unique set of functional traits, while being functionally redundant with non-threatened species in the other realms. For example, the functional traits, such as viviparity and low fecundity of some threatened amphibian species such as salamanders (Salamandra lanzai or S. algira) are unique in the Palearctic, whereas similar traits are filled by another amphibian species in tropics, such as the caecilians in Afrotropical, Neotropical and Indo-Malay.

Fig. 4. Example of threatened species supporting unique functional traits. (Photos CC-BY-SA, Wikimedia commons).  

Even if we are not able to go further and predict the ecological consequences of such changes, the loss of species with unique functional characteristics might trigger a loss of stability of the ecosystems. Our study shows that for mammals and birds, large-sized species with a slow pace of life are threatened all around the world, whereas for reptiles, amphibians, and freshwater fishes, regional or local approach should be addressed to adapt the conservation of the biodiversity to the regional or local ecosystem properties.

 

References:

  1. Toussaint, A., Charpin, N., Brosse, S. & Villéger, S. Global functional diversity of freshwater fish is concentrated in the Neotropics while functional vulnerability is widespread. Sci. Rep. 6, 22125 (2016).
  2. Carmona, C. P. et al. Erosion of global functional diversity across the tree of life. Sci. Adv. 7, eabf2675 (2021).

Aurele Toussaint

Researcher, University of Tartu