Based on the premise that evolution is an overall divergent process, some researchers have claimed that securing the human benefits that are directly provided by biodiversity may require reliance on disparate lineages of the Tree of Life1,2. However, recent studies showed that the empirical evidence supporting this theory was tenuous3 and even questioned its reliability4, which has fueled intense scientific debate5,6. This phylogenetic impasse motivated me to undertake a project aimed at empirically examining connections between evolution and human well-being; do high levels of phylogenetic diversity efficiently capture biodiversity-related services?
Figure 1. The phylogenetic diversity theory predicts that high levels of phylogenetic diversity will provide the greatest diversity of plant services. In the figure, each taxon in the phylogeny is one providing a certain type of service. Orange color in the phylogenetic branches represents the evolutionary history that is depicted by four target species between two alternative scenarios of high (left) and low (right) phylogenetic diversity, respectively. Icons are protected under Creative Commons license (see Third Party Material Information).
From the outset my co-authors and I were determined to focus on plants, because these organisms stand out as direct providers of human benefits. Besides in other ways, humans use plants for healing, clothing, feeding and warming, home-building and decorating, and even to convey feelings.
Figure 2. Some human benefits that are directly provided by plants. From top to bottom and left to right: food additives, scents, fuelwood, thatching materials, fodder, resins, dyes, medicines, fibers, smoking materials, ornamental display and food.
Indeed, the history of human civilizations cannot be understood without a consideration of plant uses. Ancient farming cultures catalyzed the transition between the Palaeolithic and Neolithic periods; Renaissance sailors set out to conquer the world in search of alternative maritime routes for the spice trade (a feat that culminated in nothing less than the discovery that the Earth is round); the extraction and commercialization of rubber deeply impacted the economic and social history of the Amazon in the 19th and early 20th centuries – just a few examples of how the destiny of humankind has always been linked to plants.
Figure 3. Some striking figures in the history of plant uses. Left, the Portuguese sailor Vasco de Gama landing in Calicut (India, 1498) during his first expedition in search of alternative routes for the spice trade; middle, Julio César Arana del Águila, a major figure in the rubber industry in the upper Amazon basin during the 19th and early 20th centuries; right, Richard Evans Schultes, who is considered the father of modern ethnobotany, discussing the properties of an Amazonian plant with indigenous people in 1940.
It was also quite clear to me that the convincing empirical evidence being sought would have to come from a global perspective, and this was a major concern, because plant uses are vastly under-documented7-9. However, in surveying my collection of botany books a light bulb went off in my head; Mabberley’s Plant-book. The best-known work of Professor David Mabberley is the most comprehensive encyclopaedic review of global plant classification and their uses published hitherto, being based on a sampling that covered more than 40 years of systematically reviewing over 1000 authoritative botanical sources. Certainly, Mabberley’s Plant-book is a treasure-trove of botanical knowledge that leaves no plant enthusiast indifferent, and so I was determined to use its priceless data in my research.
Figure 4. Mabberley’s Plant-book (fourth edition), the best-known work of Professor David Mabberley and source of data for this research (Photos: K. Halliday).
Figure 5. Left, Professor David Mabberley, co-author of the study and author of Mabberley’s Plant-book, examining a Ferdinand Bauer engraving in the State Library of New South Wales in December 2016 (Photo: M. Campbell; courtesy State Library of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia); middle, a representation of the plant Tree of Life (protected under Creative Commons license, see Third Party Material Information); right, detail of the High Performance Computing Cluster of Andalusia (Photo: P. Vázquez).
It was not an easy journey, but this phylogenetic ethnobotanical adventure finally came to a highly satisfactory outcome; my co-authors and I successfully demonstrated that maximizing phylogenetic diversity is a powerful means to capture plant services for humankind, both globally and within the main continental regions of the world. This study contributes to filling a gap of empirical knowledge linking plant evolutionary history with human well-being, and it hopefully will serve as a discussion baseline to promote better-grounded accounts of the services that are directly provided by biodiversity.
You can read the full study here.
More about me research in my personal web
- Forest, F. et al.Preserving the evolutionary potential of floras in biodiversity hotspots. Nature 445, 757–760 (2007).
- Faith, D. P. et al.Evosystem services: an evolutionary perspective on the links between biodiversity and human well-being. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability 2, 66–74 (2010).
- Tucker, C. M. et al.Assessing the utility of conserving evolutionary history. Biological Reviews 94, 1740–1760 (2019).
- Mazel, F. et al.Prioritizing phylogenetic diversity captures functional diversity unreliably. Nature Communications 9, 2888 (2018).
- Owen, N. R., Gumbs, R., Gray, C. L. & Faith, D. P. Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity. Nature Communications 10, 859 (2019).
- Mazel, F. et al.Reply to: “Global conservation of phylogenetic diversity captures more than just functional diversity”. Nature Communications 10, 858 (2019).
- Cox, P. A. Will tribal knowledge survive the millennium? Science 287, 44–45 (2000).
- Cámara-Leret, R., Paniagua-Zambrana, N., Balslev, H. & Macía, M. J. Ethnobotanical knowledge is vastly under-documented in northwestern South America. PLOS ONE 9, e85794 (2014).
- Cámara-Leret, R. & Dennehy, Z. Information gaps in indigenous and local knowledge for science-policy assessments. Nature Sustainability 2, 736–741 (2019).
- Chaffey, N. Mabberley’s Plant-book, the book about plants. Botany One https://www.botany.one/2017/08/mabberleys-plant-book-book-plants/ (2017).
THIRD PARTY MATERIAL INFORMATION
Figure 1. Icons protected under Creative Commons license CC-BY and attributed to:
- Wahyuntitle, ID (orchid); https://thenounproject.com/search/?q=orchid&i=1074679
- Mavadee, TH In the Hospital Collection (pill bottle); https://thenounproject.com/search/?creator=3978655&q=medicine&i=1790393
- Vectors Market In the Beach and Camping Glyph Icons Collection (campfire); https://thenounproject.com/search/?creator=917040&q=fire&i=1927786
- Iconixar In the Sewing - Solid Collection (yarn); https://thenounproject.com/search/?creator=3812986&q=yarn&i=3478338
Figure 5. Central image protected under Creative Commons license CC-BY-NC-SA and attributed to:
- Elmar Eye (plant Tree of Life); https://www.flickr.com/photos/seadipper/871679117/sizes/3k/in/photostream/